Home / Testifying Expert / Bad-Faith Analysis / Coverage and policy interpretation
Bad-faith analysis

Coverage and policy interpretation.

Disputes that turn on what the policy says and how the carrier applied it.

About this practice area

What the policy says, and how it was applied.

Coverage disputes ask what the insurance contract promises and whether the insurer honored it. They turn on the policy language, the declarations & endorsements, the conditions the insured had to meet, and the way the insurer read and applied all of them to the facts of the claim.

Common questions include notice and reporting under claims-made policies, the reach of exclusions, deductibles, and self-insured retentions, waiver of policy conditions, the duty to defend, and what an agent told the insured about the coverage being bought. Between insurers, coverage questions decide which carrier bears a loss, including extra-contractual exposure above policy limits.

Coverage and bad faith often travel together. An insurer that misreads its own policy may also be accused of handling the claim unreasonably, and the expert’s task is to separate what the contract required from how the claim was handled.

The policy beside the facts of the claim: thin threads match two clauses to two facts, and the controlling provision, labelled, is read across to the claim as one solid line ending in one solid mark
Engagements

Reading the contract against the claim.

Mr. Bingham has served as an insurance coverage and underwriting expert witness, in expert reports and sworn testimony, including a term life dispute in which his report addressed underwriting as well as claim issues.

Testifying expert · Report

Claims handling and coverage in a major class action

80,000page record
68-pagereport, 327 citations

Fair claims practices

Read moreShow less

Retained by a multi-national insurance conglomerate to review the 80,000-page record and issue a report on the claims handling and coverage issues presented by a major class action lawsuit against the policyholder. Allegations included bad faith, breach of contract, and failure to defend. Using case management software GIC was able to draft a 68-page report containing 327 citations to the record.

Also listed under: Claims Handling Review

Testifying expert · Report

Excess carrier’s equitable subrogation and bad-faith claims against a primary carrier

94-pagereport, 445 citations
57-pagerebuttal, 142 citations
Settledbefore the scheduled deposition

Coverage and policy interpretation

Read moreShow less

Retained by a primary carrier being sued by an excess carrier for equitable subrogation for bad faith and allegations of statutory bad faith. Mr. Bingham authored a 94-page report with 445 citations and a rebuttal report of 57 pages with 142 citations disputing the allegations. The case settled before Mr. Bingham’s scheduled deposition.

Testifying expert · Report, Deposition

Term life death claim: underwriting and claim issues

Underwritingand claim issues

Coverage and policy interpretation

Read moreShow less

Retained by plaintiff as an expert on a dispute involving a death claim against a term life policy. His report opined on both underwriting and claim issues. The plaintiff was ultimately successful and obtained a favorable settlement from the insurer.

Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama

Also listed under: Testimony record

Other matters

Uninsured/underinsured motorist claim: bad faith and breach of contractTestifyingFair claims practicesRead moreShow less

Retained by a major personal lines carrier on an uninsured/underinsured claim where the policyholder was alleging bad faith and breach of contract. This state court case was settled upon production of Glynloen’s report.

Notice and reporting under a claims-made policyTestifyingCoverage and policy interpretationRead moreShow less

Engaged by a major carrier to offer expert opinions in support of claim denial asserting breach of contract, specifically notice and reporting issues on a claim made policy. Mr. Bingham’s report cited in detail the breaches, offered a timeline, and described the usual, customary, and ordinary practice for insurance carriers.

Also listed under: Claims Handling Review

Insurer recouping a large deductible after waiving conditionsTestifyingCoverage and policy interpretationRead moreShow less

Retained by a hospital to opine on policy interpretation, claims documentation, and fair claim practices of an insurer attempting to recoup a large deductible after waiving contract terms and conditions.

Circuit Court of the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, Will County, Illinois

Also listed under: Testimony record

Agent misrepresentation of policy termsTestifyingCoverage and policy interpretationRead moreShow less

Retained as an expert for policyholder suing agent for misrepresentation of policy terms and other errors and omissions allegations.

Also listed under: Defense of TPAs, Agencies, and Counsel

Engage GIC

Have a matter that involves coverage?

Start with a conflict and availability check.