Home / Testifying Expert / Bad-Faith Analysis
Bad-faith analysis

One standard, no matter which side.

As an insurance bad-faith expert witness, Mr. Bingham measures the parties’ conduct toward one another against fair claims practices statutes, industry standards of care, conformity to policy language, and the carrier’s own claim-handling standards. We have a passion for bad-faith cases and have had great success communicating complex insurance issues before the court.

About this practice area

Conduct between insurers and policyholders.

In an insurance dispute, the only standards which govern the actions of the policyholder are the terms and conditions contained within the policy. However, an insurer’s conduct is governed by standards set forth in the policy, statutes & regulations, and industry custom & practice. Bad faith is the claim that an insurer failed to deal fairly with its own policyholder. In first-party cases, the dispute is over the policyholder’s own claim: a property, auto, life, health, or disability claim that was denied, delayed, or underpaid. In third-party cases, the insurer is accused of failing to protect its insured against a liability claim, most often by declining a settlement offer within policy limits and leaving the insured exposed to a verdict above them.

Many states also set out claim-handling duties in unfair claims settlement practices statutes and regulations, and those standards are often at the center of the dispute. Related claims arise between insurers themselves, as when an excess carrier sues the primary carrier over a failure to settle, and between policyholders and the agents who placed their coverage. Coverage questions, such as notice under claims-made policies, exclusions, deductibles, and the duty to defend, frequently run alongside the bad-faith claim.

Expert testimony in these matters usually turns on the standard of care: what a reasonable insurer would have done with the same information at the same point in the claim.

Claims against a claims professional other than the insurer, such as a third-party administrator, agency, or defense counsel, are covered under Claims Handling Review.

Engagements

One standard, whichever side retains us.

Policyholders’ attorneys retain GIC, and so do insurers’ attorneys. On each engagement GIC reads the full claim file and builds the timeline from the record, and Mr. Bingham measures each step against the standard that applied at the time.

Testifying expert · Report

Claims handling and coverage in a major class action

80,000page record
68-pagereport, 327 citations

Fair claims practices

Read moreShow less

Retained by a multi-national insurance conglomerate to review the 80,000-page record and issue a report on the claims handling and coverage issues presented by a major class action lawsuit against the policyholder. Allegations included bad faith, breach of contract, and failure to defend. Using case management software GIC was able to draft a 68-page report containing 327 citations to the record.

Also listed under: Claims Handling Review

Testifying expert · Report

California wildfire and mudslide losses at a luxury resort

250,000+pages in the record
Business incomeand extended business income

Property & Catastrophe

Read moreShow less

Engaged by a five-star luxury resort for a breach of contract and bad-faith litigation in California arising from wildfires and mudslides. The losses arise from building, building personal property, business income, and extended business income coverages. The record consists of in excess of 250,000 pages.

Also listed under: Business Interruption Analysis

Testifying expert · Report, Deposition

Texas ice storms, February 2021: property damage and business income

2021Texas ice storms
Business incomeproperty and contents claims

Property & Catastrophe

Read moreShow less

Engaged by an entertainment concern which suffered major damage and loss during the Texas ice storms of February 2021. This policyholder is contesting the carrier’s refusal to pay the benefits for property damage, business personal property, and loss of business income.

U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, Waco Division

Also listed under: Business Interruption Analysis · Testimony record

Testifying expert · Report

Excess carrier’s equitable subrogation and bad-faith claims against a primary carrier

94-pagereport, 445 citations
57-pagerebuttal, 142 citations
Settledbefore the scheduled deposition

Coverage and policy interpretation

Read moreShow less

Retained by a primary carrier being sued by an excess carrier for equitable subrogation for bad faith and allegations of statutory bad faith. Mr. Bingham authored a 94-page report with 445 citations and a rebuttal report of 57 pages with 142 citations disputing the allegations. The case settled before Mr. Bingham’s scheduled deposition.

Testifying expert · Report

Workers compensation bad-faith allegations against a TPA (South Dakota)

42-pagereport, 118 citations
16 daysfrom retention to report

Defense of TPAs, agencies, and counsel

Read moreShow less

Engaged by a major claim third party administrator to address allegations of bad faith for their handling of a South Dakota workers compensation claim. Mr. Bingham’s 42-page report contained 118 citations. This report was completed 16 days from the date of retention.

Also listed under: Defense of TPAs, Agencies, and Counsel

Testifying expert · Report, Deposition

Major fire and business interruption at an entertainment venue

Business incomeproperty and contents claims

Property & Catastrophe

Read moreShow less

Engaged by an entertainment concern which suffered major structural damage, including substantial business interruption claims due to a major fire. This policyholder is contesting the carrier’s refusal to pay the benefits for property damage, business personal property, and loss of business income.

U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky, Paducah Division

Also listed under: Business Interruption Analysis · Testimony record

Other matters

Civil-unrest business interruption and property claim for a Chicago hotelierConsultingBusiness interruptionRead moreShow less

Engaged to consult on a large business interruption and property damage claim stemming from civil unrest. Starting in June of 2020, served as an outside consultant for a major Chicago based hotelier assisting in the preparation and presentation of a significant business interruption and property damage claim against a major commercial property insurer. Mr. Bingham worked with BDO and various property contractors to complete the carrier’s statement of loss. GIC assisted the policyholders counsel in preparing for and completing litigation.

Also listed under: Business Interruption Analysis

Term life death claim: underwriting and claim issuesTestifyingCoverage and policy interpretationRead moreShow less

Retained by plaintiff as an expert on a dispute involving a death claim against a term life policy. His report opined on both underwriting and claim issues. The plaintiff was ultimately successful and obtained a favorable settlement from the insurer.

Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama

Also listed under: Testimony record

Fire and business interruption loss from civil disturbance (Chicago restaurant)TestifyingProperty & CatastropheRead moreShow less

Retained by a Chicago restauranteur in bad-faith litigation with a major property insurer over a fire and business interruption loss stemming from civil disturbance. In addition to a report for the Federal Court, GIC assisted in the examination of carrier staff focusing particularly on deviations from the Illinois Fair Claim Practices Act and usual, customary, and ordinary practice. Case was settled at mediation.

Also listed under: Business Interruption Analysis

Residential hail and wind bad-faith claimsTestifyingProperty & CatastropheRead moreShow less

Retained by a top tier personal lines insurer on multiple residential hail/wind claims where policyholders are alleging bad faith and breach of contract. Mr. Bingham has authored reports for both state and Federal courts and has given or is in the course of giving depositions.

Court of Common Pleas, Warren County, Ohio

Also listed under: Testimony record

Uninsured/underinsured motorist claim: bad faith and breach of contractTestifyingFair claims practicesRead moreShow less

Retained by a major personal lines carrier on an uninsured/underinsured claim where the policyholder was alleging bad faith and breach of contract. This state court case was settled upon production of Glynloen’s report.

Notice and reporting under a claims-made policyTestifyingCoverage and policy interpretationRead moreShow less

Engaged by a major carrier to offer expert opinions in support of claim denial asserting breach of contract, specifically notice and reporting issues on a claim made policy. Mr. Bingham’s report cited in detail the breaches, offered a timeline, and described the usual, customary, and ordinary practice for insurance carriers.

Also listed under: Claims Handling Review

Review of a claims department’s staffing, procedures, and settlement practicesTestifyingCarrier claims-practice reviewsRead moreShow less

Completed reviews and expert reports assessing propriety of Subject Company’s claim department’s staffing, claims handling policies & procedures, and overall fairness of Company’s claim settlement practices.

Also listed under: Carrier claims-practice reviews & audits · Reserve adequacy studies · Claim audits and file scoring

Insurer recouping a large deductible after waiving conditionsTestifyingCoverage and policy interpretationRead moreShow less

Retained by a hospital to opine on policy interpretation, claims documentation, and fair claim practices of an insurer attempting to recoup a large deductible after waiving contract terms and conditions.

Circuit Court of the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, Will County, Illinois

Also listed under: Testimony record

Multi-million-dollar tornado-loss claimsConsultingBusiness interruptionRead moreShow less

Consultation on multi-million-dollar tornado-loss claims with complex restoration timelines.

Also listed under: Business Interruption Analysis

Failure to settle multi-fatality death claimsTestifyingFair claims practicesRead moreShow less

Retained by decedent’s estate in a bad-faith/breach-of-contract action against a self-insured for failure to settle death claims resulting from a driving while intoxicated accident involving multiple fatalities; Expert opinion report; sworn deposition.

U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina

Also listed under: Defense of TPAs, Agencies, and Counsel · Testimony record

Subrogation claim after a condominium fireTestifyingProperty & CatastropheRead moreShow less

Retained by insurer of condominium owner to resist subrogation claim of carrier attempting to recover for payments to complex from major fire loss originating in owner’s unit. Expert opinion report; sworn deposition.

192nd District Court, Dallas County, Texas

Also listed under: Testimony record

Illinois Fair Claim Practices Act and standards of care in a hospitality bad-faith caseTestifyingFair claims practicesRead moreShow less

Retained by a Chicago based hospitality and entertainment operator to offer opinions in an insurance bad-faith litigation. Mr. Bingham opined on breaches of the Illinois Fair Claim Practices Act as well as industry standards of care and best practices.

Also listed under: Business Interruption Analysis · Claims Handling Review

Agent misrepresentation of policy termsTestifyingCoverage and policy interpretationRead moreShow less

Retained as an expert for policyholder suing agent for misrepresentation of policy terms and other errors and omissions allegations.

Also listed under: Defense of TPAs, Agencies, and Counsel

Personal articles policy bad-faith claim (Texas)TestifyingFair claims practicesRead moreShow less

Retained as an expert on a Texas bad-faith claim controversy arising from a personal lines personal articles policy. Expert’s report tendered.

Insurance agency accused of negligence and bad-faith claims conductTestifyingClaims handling reviewRead moreShow less

Retained as expert for an Insurance Agency by their E&O carrier to defend against allegations of negligence, violations of the State Insurance Code, and “bad faith” claims conduct.

Also listed under: Claims Handling Review

Engage GIC

Have a matter that involves bad faith?

Start with a conflict and availability check.